![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Despair of the Hmong refugees in Thailand:
|
|||||||
The aim of the classification is to facilitate the return of the Hmong refugees as soon as possible, according to the Thai government officials. According to the Deputy Chief of Internal Security Operations Command, General Panlop, some of the Hmongs who worked for the Therein lies the problem. The Laotian government refuses to accept the Hmongs in The repression on the Hmongs of Laos require little introduction. Despite repression in On 28 November 2005, Thai police in Phetchabun's Khao Kho district arrested 29 Hmongs, mostly teenagers from Ban Huay Nam Khao while they were returning from a religious service at a nearby church. Authorities deported 27 of them across the The status of these refouled Hmongs, mostly children, remained unknown despite interventions of the international community. In July 2005, the Thai authorities forced the local land owners in Phetchabun's Khao Kho district to expel the Hmong asylum seekers or face charges for sheltering illegal immigrants, which carry maximum penalties of five years in prison and a 50,000-baht fine. In a meeting in early July 2005, the National Security Council and the Police Immigration Bureau decided to forcefully repatriate the Hmongs. On 4 July 2005, one of the refugees reportedly attempted suicide and 10 others threatened to kill themselves after being evicted from temporary shelter. Five Hmong refugees died of diarrhoea and several had fallen sick after they were forced out of temporary shelters to stay along a road. It was only after the intervention of the National Human Rights Commission on 8 July 2005 that the Royal Thai Government halted its plan of forceful repatriation of the 6,558 Hmong indigenous refugees to The Royal Thai Government, although not a party to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of the Refugees, has obligations for protection of the refugees staying in its soil, including the Hmongs. There are no past records to show that Laos has either acceded to any request by the international community for respecting the human rights of the Hmongs or that it implemented any of the recommendations made to it by the UN chartered bodies. On 18 April 2005, the CERD Committee after examining the report of the government of Laos expressed concerns “at reports that serious acts of violence have been perpetrated against members of the Hmong minority, in particular allegations that soldiers brutalized and killed a group of five Hmong children on 19 May 2004” and urged Laos to “provide more precise information about the bodies responsible for investigating these allegations and allow United Nations bodies for the protection and promotion of human rights to visit the areas in which members of the Hmong minority have taken refuge”. But no action has been taken by the government of The government of If the Hmong refugees currently sheltered in Thailand were to be returned to |
|||||||
Home / About ACHR / Campaigns / Press Releases / ACHR in Media / Countries / Links Briefing Papers / Reports / ACHR Impact / Contact us |
|||||||