Bangladesh
: Rule of the peeping Generals
The
euphoria and bonhomie about the military take over are all set to be dispelled
as the generals show their teeth and control politics even in the bedrooms of
former Prime Ministers Begum Khaleda Zia of Bangladesh National Party and Sheikh Hasina Wazed of the
Awami League. According to Odhikar, 95,825 persons have reportedly been arrested under the
Bangladesh Emergency Power Rules of 2007 between 12 Januray to 12 March 2007 while 50 persons have been killed by the security forces. But, the Home Ministry won’t tolerate
any discussion on politics even in the bedrooms.
In
a statement on 9 March 2007, Home Ministry stated:
“Despite the existing ban on processions,
meetings and rallies under the Emergency Power Rules, 2007, different political
parties were continuing to hold indoor meetings and rallies and the government
was showing leniency attitude towards this matter.
So, all concerned are hereby apprised that
until any other order in this regard is issued, all sorts of indoor politics
and pubic meetings and political will remain banned.”
Holding
discussion on legal aid to the arrested persons in the bedrooms may tantamount
to “indoor politics”.
I. The Coup and the plotters:
The role of the international community
Undoubtedly,
both Begum Zia and Sheikh Hasina are responsible for the present situation. Both
allowed looting of the country, growth of the religious fundamentalists
and their personal acrimony virtually prevented consolidation of democracy in
the country while minorities and indigenous peoples suffered innumerable
atrocities. Their personal acrimony – or family
politics - prevailed over.
The Jatiyo Sangsad, the parliament, seldom functioned and its sessions were marked
by boycotts by the opposition – with the sole aim of coming to power.
Begum
Zia and Sheikh Hasina did not leave any space to the international community
but constrained the international community to support takeover by a neutral party.
International community disapproved of direct military takeover but in more
ways than one, they approved of their indirect takeover. Bangladesh Army was
warned of dire consequences including a ban on recruitment of Bangladeshi
soldiers for the UN Peace Keeping Operations in the event of military supporting
the Bangladesh National Party. However, the smoothness with which the caretaker
government took control of the situation showed the direct hand of the military.
II. Has the situation
improved?
The
pertinent question remains whether the situation has improved.
International
community is quite happy with the emergency arrangements. Yet, situation is far
from being hunky-dory. International community will face the crunch situation
sooner than later.
a. Mainland
There
is general euphoria and
It
is easy to write-off Begum Zia in the current scheme of things. Current army chief,
General Moeen U. Ahmed would like to hold elections before his scheduled
retirement in June 2008 and ensure the defeat of the BNP to avoid any retribution. The generals have been more
than lenient on the Jammats and the Liberal Democratic Party, breakway faction
of the BNP. Both the Jammat and LDP leaders were serving in the government.
If Sheikh Hasina comes
back to power, the situation will be back to square one. Only Mohammed Yunus knows
what kind of support his political party Nagarik Shakti has. Average
Bangladeshis are proud of his Nobel Prize but that does not necessarily mean
support to his political party.
Sooner or later, the entire middle class
of
The
problem is not with cleansing the country of the corrupt politicians but as to
how the care taker government acts within the confines of the rule of law.
Until now, it has not spelt out its plan but has been acting as law unto
itself. With no signs of holding the elections in the near future, the actions may appear to cling
on to the power. Sooner or later, those in the care-taker government might hold the elections to prolong quasi-military dictatorship.
b. The periphery: Situation in
the Chittagong Hill Tracts
Since
the emergency was declared on 11 January 2007, the army and the police have
gone wild - illegally arresting, detaining, torturing and intimidating indigenous
Jumma activists in the Chittagong Hill Tracts especially under Section 54 of Bangladesh Penal Code. On 3 March 2007, a group of army personnel from Ghilachari
camp under Naniachar Thana arrested Suresh Mohan Chakma, son of Phedera Chakma
at Choichari village without any warrant or reason. The victim was tortured in
the army custody in Ghilachari of Rangamati district and he died on 7 March
2007, a day after being released.
The activists of both
the Parbatya Chattagram Jana Samhati Samiti (PCJSS)
and United People’s Democratic Front (UPDF) - two indigenous Jumma political organisations have been targeted.
Among
the activists of PCJSS who were arrested included Bikram Marma, President of
Kaptai upazila branch of PCJSS from his house at Chandraghona Christian
Missionary Hospital area under Rangunia upazila in Chittagong district at the midnight
of 4 February 2007; Sai Mong Marma, Organising Secretary of Kaptai upazila
branch of PCJSS, from his house at Raikhali under Kaptai upazila in Rangamati
district at the midnight of 11 February 2007; Balabhadra Chakma alias Pranjal,
Vice President of Dighinala upazila branch of PCJSS, at Mahajan Para in
Khagrachari on 5 March 2007; Manubha Ranjan Chakma, President of Baghaichari
upazila branch of PCJSS, who was arrested by the Bangladesh Rifles in
Baghaichari upazila in Rangamati district on 5 March 2007; Satyabir Dewan, Bimal Kanti Chakma, Ranjait Kumar Dewan, Udayjoy
Chakma and Mayachan Chakma who were arrested
under Kotowali police station of Rangamati District on 18 February 2007.
On the night of 10 March 2006, an activist of the United People’s
Democratic Front (UPDF) Kalo Priya Chakma was arrested by the army
personnel at Gurgujjyachari village in Khagrachari district of the Chittagong
Hill Tracts. He was later handed over to the Khagrachari police station.
Even the indigenous people’s civil society organizations were not spared. On 27 February 2007, District Social Welfare Department of
Khagrachari district issued a notice to Trinamul Unnayan Sangstha (TUS), a
non-governmental organisation run by indigenous peoples
to stop all its activities on the charges that it was being involved in
“anti-state and anti-people’s interest activities”. The notice was issued under
the sub-section 2 (Ma) of the Emergency Power Rules 2007. The sub-section 2
(Ma) says that it may be applicable for “political party, trade union, club or
samity (society)”. The authorities did not specify what "anti-state and
anti-people's interest activities" have been committed by the TUS. Nor has
the TUS representatives were called for any explanation before the notice was
issued.
Forcible evictions continue unabated. In
a latest case of forcible eviction of indigenous peoples from their land, the
III. Conclusion:
International community must not be complacent with eerily order in Bangladesh. The care-taker government cannot be allowed to act as law unto itself.