|
COLUMN
Guns and talks in
India's Wretched of the Earth By Suhas
Chakma
On 15 October 2004, the government of
Andhra Pradesh and the Peoples War Group (PWG) held
first ever-direct talk to resolve the three decade old
armed conflict. Earlier on 16 June 2004, the Andhra
Pradesh government declared a three-month ceasefire
which has further been extended. A 20 member ceasefire
monitoring committee consisting of civil liberties
activists, journalists, trade union leaders, political
leaders and retired bureaucrats has been formed. In a
further confidence building measure, on 20 July 2004,
Andhra Pradesh government withdrew the ban on the
PWG. This is the most serious attempt to find a
negotiated settlement with the PWG which was formed by
Kondapalli Seetharamaiah on 22 April 1980 to fight
against social injustices and economic exploitation of
the poorer segments of the society. The peace talks
initiated in May 2002 collapsed after three rounds of
preliminary discussions as the State government refused
to accede to PWG demands for an official cease-fire and
termination of alleged 'fake encounters' and arrests of
Naxal cadres. Earlier, in 1989, then Chief Minister M.
Channa Reddy withdrew the ban on the PWG. The PWG
allegedly exploited the freedom to consolidate its
strength and the government banned it again in 1992.
During the talks on 15 October 2004, the PWG will be
represented by Ramakrishna, Secretary of Andhra Pradesh
State Committee of the PWG, S Sudhakar, Secretary of the
Andhra-Orissa Border Special Zonal Committee and Ganesh,
member of the North Telangana Special Zonal Committee.
The approved agenda, among others, includes the
withdrawal of cases against Naxalite activists, release
of political prisoners, removal of cash awards on
activists of Naxalite groups, disbanding of
anti-Naxalite groups and creation of a separate
Telengana state. The lack of land reforms is the
single most important factor for the Naxalite movement.
Despite adoption of a large number of laws including
Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling and Agricultural
Holdings) Act, 1973, land reforms has never been
adequately implemented. According to the Bureau of
Economics and Statistics, for 1998-99 the net sown area
in Andhra Pradesh is a little over 1.09 crore hectares
out of the total geographical area of over 2.74 crore
hectares. Out of these, only about four lakh hectares of
surplus lands was declared since the adoption of the Act
in 1973. It took nearly 10 years to acquire the surplus
land from land owning farmers, owing to prolonged
litigation. Yet, in the year 1995, the non-tribals were
in possession of 7,51,435.66 acres of lands in Scheduled
Areas in clear violation of the Ninth Schedule of the
Constitution of India. Developmental funds are either
mis-used or remain unutilized. In the meeting with
Naxalite affected states on 21 September 2004, Minister
of State for Home, Sriprakash Jaiswal stated that funds
allotted to some states in 2003 under the Scheme of
Backward Districts Initiative (BDI) had not be utilised
fully. Consequently, the Centre decided that the states
would not get the next installment of the central fund
till they showed they had used up the money given in the
previous year. The National Democratic Alliance
government had included 53 Naxal-affected districts
under the BDI. Each of these districts will get an
additional Rs 15 crores a year for three years from the
Centre. Yet, in 2002-2003 the Central government
received proposals under Integrated Action Plans,
encompassing development as well as security aspects in
the affected areas, of Rs.1299.17 crores from Andhra
Pradesh, Rs.1862.72 crores from Bihar, Rs.1435.13 crores
from Chattisgarh, Rs.615 crores from Madhya Pradesh, of
Rs.838 crores from Maharashtra and Rs.268.84 crores from
Orissa. Yet, the most States cannot utilize a meager Rs
15 crores per district. Apart from poverty and land
alienation, the atrocities against the Scheduled Castes
and Scheduled Tribes provide the grounds of growth of
Naxalism. Whether it is in the case of the massacre of
Dalits at Tsundur village in Guntur district in 1991 or
brutal murder of a dalit leader, Birusanti Obanna from
Koilkuntla area of Kurnool district on 22 January 2004,
perpetrators often go unpunished. Andhra Pradesh
government had established only 12 Special Courts by
2003 under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the conviction
rate for offences against the SCs and STs remains
extremely low primary because of the caste bias. The
Kurnool District Special Court for under SC/ST
Prevention of Atrocities Act, rejected 39 cases
registered under the Act between 29 May and 3 September
1999 on the grounds that the crimes - which included
murders, assaults, rapes - were not committed on account
of the victims being Dalit, but on account of enmity and
lust. The judge in his orders did not give any reason as
to how he arrived at this conclusion. Out of the 1,805
cases of atrocities against SCs and STs registered in
1998, 1,897 cases in 1999 and 1,912 cases in 2000, only
27 persons were convicted by May 2001. Extrajudicial
executions have been part of anti-Naxalite operations.
The Andhra Pradesh Police reportedly established an
armed vigilante group known as the "Green Tigers.
The NHRC has investigated some 285 reported cases of
so-called "fake encounter deaths" allegedly committed by
the Andhra police in connection with anti-Naxalite
operations. In its 1996-97 annual report, the NHRC
stated that the evidence on record did not show in any
of the cases "that any prior attempt" was made by the
police to arrest the deceased persons and in "none of
these encounters, did police personnel receive any
injury", while one or more persons from the other side
died. "No attempt whatsoever" was made to ascertain the
identity of the police officers who fired the bullets
that caused the deaths, and that no attempt was made to
investigate the circumstances under which the police
opened fire. Unless, both the Naxalites and state
government of Andhra Pradesh can develop mechanisms to
address land alienation of the tribals and land reforms,
and establish accountability for atrocities against SCs
and STs and extrajudicial executions, the Naxalite
movements are unlikely to wither away. *( The
author is Director, Asian Centre for Human
Rights) |