![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACHR PRESS RELEASE _________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
| ACHR Index: PR/PAK/01/06 |
13 September 2006
|
About 80% of incarcerated women in Pakistan are The proposed bill seeks to amend the four male witness requirements under the Hudood Ordinance to prove rape and allow bail for women arrested under the Hudood Ordinance. However, as the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA) and Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) opposed the Bill, the government reached an agreement to keep the Hudood Ordinance under the statute and try both rape and adultery cases under the Hudood laws and Under the Hudood Ordinance, if a woman who claims to have been raped fails to prove, she can be convicted of adultery, which is punishable by death in the most stringent circumstances. A rape victim is required to produce at least four adult male Muslim eyewitnesses, who have physically seen the act of rape against the victim, in order to prove her claims. Because of social taboos, discriminatory laws and victimisation of victims by police, most rape cases are not reported in ACHR also condemned the proposed new offence under Section 502 B of the Pakistan Penal Code which provides that “Whoever publicises any case of zina or rape whereby the identity of any woman or her family member is disclosed shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to six months or fine or with both”. “This is nothing but an attempt to silence Mukthar Mais from speaking before the press. This itself reflects the lack of commitment of the government to protect the women in [Ends] |
|
Home / About ACHR / Campaigns / Press Releases / ACHR in Media / Countries / Links Briefing Papers / Reports / ACHR Impact / Contact us |
|